It works, but I will do this, when the final is out. I use instead the description fields of IDimager.į) I try automatic assigning of parent labels just in IMatch 5. I didn't import the database of IDimager.ĭ) I used synonyms one time and stop this in IDimager. A lot of problems was probably caused by ACDSee Pro or Media Expression.Ĭ) In IMatch I create a new database -> after this I import the whole folder/directory. But every now and than I have to repair it again after a new importing. They keywords was written in "keywords" and "XMP Adobe Lightroom" (mostly).ī) Repair: One period after an update, IDimager wrote all hierarchical keywords also with every keyword: For example: Places|Germany|Reutlingen + Places|Germany + Places + Germany + Reutlingen Other stuff I have to repair (After I beg Hert a view times, he changes PSU, that it write also the UTF-8 Stamp) was the german letters/Umlaute (like ö,ä.). But at last step, I let PSU write all my hierarchical keywords to ITPC and EXIF. Ok, I'll try to explain it in english (this is difficulty for me).įirst I have to explain, that my images and their written metatags have a longer history: ACDSee Pro 3 -> Media Expression 2 -> IDimager -> Daminion -> PSU -> IMatch 5 Ī) This history lead to the problem, that my keywords are written in different places/ITPC-Fields. The good thing about both IDimager and iMatch is that they have a scripting interface that allows us to automate the migration. Your pdf would certainly be helpful and I am compiling a little excel file that lists the IDimager features that I use, the corresponding iMatch feature, and the way I think I will migrate wrt to that feature. But that depends on whether Mario would find that acceptable. I actually wanted to say that I expect that there are many more IDimager users wanting to move to iMatch and that maybe a "migration" chapter would be useful in the forum. And although iMatch 3.x has lacked a bit in features/usability, it looks like it's completely caught up with 5.x.īut I'm digressing I do not want to use the iMatch forum to complain about another program. I cannot work for more than 10 minutes until I run into an issue. However, it has now been discontinued and has become very unreliable in the last few years. Feature wise I still like it and it serves my purpose very well. Many years ago I started with iMatch but after a few years moved to IDimager because at that time IDimager had a much friendlier user interface. I am also an IDimager user and am very likely to migrate to iMatch.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |